Chapter 54: Bidet and the Healthcare Beast
Chapter 54: Bidet and the Healthcare Beast:
The evening
after I return Spencer and William arrived at my apartment; they were on their
way to San Francisco and stopped for rest. The following morning, we stroll through
Sugarhouse Park. The Wasatch mountains to the east are gorgeously snow-capped atop
a sea of yellow and red deciduous trees, with long shadows cast by the low morning
sun. The saturated and saturated colors of the landscape was a palette prepared
for painting. Looking at the snowy mountains, I was determined to ski
excessively as long as I remained functionally able. Ben, Spencer’s brother,
had, in fact, already arranged ways to pull me up several mountains, in case
the resorts had poor snow and I lacked the stamina for hiking, just so that we
could ski together. Again, I’m reminded how great my friends are.
When we
return to my apartment, Spencer loudly announces, “I’m going to go bidet
myself!” He runs into the restroom. What follows is a complex symphony of screaming,
and giggling. When he exits, he’s followed by a powerful miasma of colonic
content. We force him to turn on the fan and light a candle. Apparently, the
deodorizer in the bidet was not enough. He then announces that the bidet was very
nice, but that he pressed all the buttons and that the “strong mode” was shocking.
He also mentioned that the heated seat was wonderful. Next, William decided next
that he wanted to try the bidet. Again, more stifled screams and giggling. Apparently,
he was so surprised by the “strong” mode that he stood up and got sprayed. Obviously,
we decided that everyone should have a bidet. Spencer and William leave early the
following morning, and so we say goodbyes before bed.
The next morning,
I have a neuro-ophthalmology appointment to investigate my visual deficit.
After 4 redundant and inefficient hours, they finally map my visual fields. The
map confirms my basic suspicions: the whole left side is affected, with mild
sparing of inner upper left quadrant. I was signed up for driving occupational therapy
to objectively monitor if I could effectively use compensating strategies to
drive safely. The driving OT went strikingly well, and I was told I should be
able to drive without restrictions. I felt a confident renewal of my independence.
Physicians often need to have conversations
with patients about driving, for obvious public health and safety reasons. I
regret not taking these conversations more seriously when I was practicing. Driving
is a deeply dignifying task that exudes independence in a way that other activities
cannot. Driving is additionally baked into the shared American Mythos and
identity. We stop a patient from driving, and we take away their sense of
nationality and personal dignity; it’s a big deal and the paternalistic
overtones infantilize the patient. I’m certainly not advocating letting unsafe
persons drive, but I am saying that the conversation is more layered and meaningful
than the surface-level, functional conversations that often occur.
A most
aggravating part of being diagnosed with terminal cancer was the shift in
priorities. My schedule became dictated and structured by appointments or
therapies; some would occasionally change suddenly without warning. While most
visits shared the same electronic medical record, all invariably required the same
medical and personal information paperwork to be redundantly completed by hand
ad nauseum. I open my chart on my phone and immediately see the same
information I was presently writing. There had to be a litigious reason. Apparently,
certain elements needed to be documented for each new or returning patient
visit for billing purposes. Like most Kafkaesque inconveniences, these were
products of bureaucracy and billing. As a patient, I’ve come to understand how
many people can feel abandoned by their doctor or lost in the health-care
system: money is opaquely of primary import to the system and to the patient.
Costs seem to increase, while patients’ time is increasingly occupied by
redundant paperwork.
The doctor and clinic staff are the most
patient facing and receive the bulk of complaints and active frustration. But
they have no control over this Kafkaesque nightmare. Insurance and
administrators are poised to profit from persons’ sickness and misery, and unwittingly
create systems that prioritize cash over care. The system needs to change, but nucleation
of that solution will not come from these patient-facing employees. And so, I
chose not to be visibly upset at staff when presented with excessive documentation
or must spend hours with no relation to my care in sterile clinic rooms.
Our healthcare system is for-profit.
As a patient, it becomes quickly obvious that the chance for profit is more
important than my care. Standard care: “Do you want to try this? Insurance
might not pay, but you might be able to get a financial discount through the
company. You need to fill out this financial paperwork.” Then an unexpected
bill comes, and I must do it all over again. Some physicians will tout the
clinical trial system as a way for patients to get access to novel medications
without large expense. But eligibility in a trial depends on a prediction of
positive results, and so the sickest and most destitute patients are preemptively
cut or are unable to afford travel to join many trials. The clinical trial
system is really designed to produce new and profitable medications that can be
sold for millions to billions of dollars.
And hospitals in general abuse a
free labor pool. Hospitals are paid approximately $150k per resident per year.
In general, residents receive $50-70k; the rest is used for “graduate medical
education.”However, it’s patently obvious that $80k is not spent per year per
resident to present last year’s PowerPoints, or to assign topics to residents
to teach other residents. Residents work at least 60 hours per week, and often 80
or more. They perform a job for which the hospital would have to pay a midlevel
or fully licensed physician hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. So, residents
are essentially free and come with bonus money for the hospital. Thankfully,
the University of Utah generally treats residents well, especially given the recent
pandemic conditions. However, friends at other medical programs have been
forced to work as nurses or phlebotomists on COVID units and to put in hundreds
of hours of extra time working on COVID units. All unpaid. So where is all that
money going? Hospital administrators, insurance companies, and pharmaceutical
industries. What better time to make money than during a pandemic? Some argue
that without a capitalist, profiteering healthcare system, research innovations
and advances become uninspired and cease. Yes, I would love for a miracle cure
for myself to be developed, but not at the expense of thousands of hours of
life from untreated illness due to poverty and care-access issues. The benefits
of our “quick care” and “unique treatments” come at the expense of lower
socioeconomic persons losing access to healthcare altogether. We must
acknowledge that we’re trading “less-valued” persons for the health and comfort
of “well-valued” people. It’s a form of gentrification and it’s visibly
appalling.
Comments
Post a Comment