Chapter 36: interview season
Chapter 36: interview season
Interview season for residency
intermingled with the 4th year rotations. I had several before the
neurology rotation, and even one or two during that rotation.
My first
interview was at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City. It was November. I
flew in on a Sunday and had a nearby hotel to stay at. Quickly the trip became
disastrous as I realized that I forgot most of my suit, including a shirt and
tie. There was nothing nearby open because of it being Sunday, and the
pre-interview dinner with residents was in a couple hours. This was usually
when you could talk with the residents without administrative staff in order to
get a better idea of how the residents liked or disliked the program. Uber and
Lyft weren’t running at the time. I found a Target about a two mile walk away.
It was hot but I started walking. Eventually I get to Target. There’s an
accident right outside and so it takes some time to cross the street. I rush
into the store and head straight to the men’s clothing, where I find a white
shirt and a red tie that look like they’ll fit well. Target’s “goodfellow”
brand, saving me. I buy them and rush out the store and head back to my hotel
room. I drop off the shirt and tie with the rest of my stuff. I realize I’ve
sweat through most of my clothes at this point. I take a quick shower and put
on something semi-casual for the dinner. We had been advised by older
classmates and the administration not to try too hard at the dinner because it
can give off an uppity and uptight attitude, and that sometimes the dinners
came into play for overall interviewee ranking.
The dinner
is at a local brewery. We’re at a big table in the back and have nametags that
say where we’re from and our names, as do the residents. The dinner is
essentially beer and pizza—not exactly what I was expecting from Utah. They
kept ordering pitchers of more beer throughout the night, as though to show
that Utah was not as uptight as it’s reputation may suggest. Immediately there
are many questions about Mormons and being accepted at the hospital if not
religious, and class cohesiveness. There are also questions about research
opportunities, and where residents often go after finishing. The residents tell
us that the majority of the class is non-Mormon and that it’s never been an
issue either way. They add on that fewer than half the people living in Salt
Lake are Mormon. Then of course they reassure the research opportunities and
tell us that most people go into cardiology or match to whatever fellowship
they want. Then they start to tell us about the outdoor activities and fun
things that the residents are able to do during residents. One particular
resident got 100 ski days in on his intern year, granted many of them were half
days. Most of the other residents were also skiers and got many days in the
past year. It was certainly a convincing argument. The dinner ended. We thanked
the residents and said our goodbyes and they wished us luck for the next day. I
walked back to my hotel and set out everything for the next day before heading
right to bed.
The next
day I get ready quickly for the interview, review my application to remember
what sort of questions to expect and then head over to the hospital. It’s a
beautiful campus and immediately impressive. There were plenty of signs to
guide us through the hospital into a conference room where there were bagels
and coffee (good sign already). We picked up our folders which also had our
interview schedules and interviewers. First was a general welcome during the
breakfast and a general overview of the program and faculty. This was done by
the chief residents. Next was time to mingle and relax while others went for
interviews. The rest of us rotated through brief, 1-2 minute, quick sit-down
talks with the program director. This short time with the program director was
the first interview of any kind I had yet for any of 4th year. I was
mildly terrified. When I entered her office she was warm and friendly. She
immediately asked me about my time in Japan and so I told her about my
motivations and goals and experiences related. I was happy about this question
because it was such a formative time of my life. And then that was it. The
first (albeit mini) interview done. I go back to the room. Then we go on what
will seem to become the ceremonial tour of the hospital. I have my first full
interview right before lunch. It goes overall well—I’m asked about research and
explain how I’m open to it but not looking for any career in research. They
seem to appreciate my honesty. The interview goes well. Then it’s lunch. I chug
more coffee; final interview goes well too. I give myself a little mini-congratulations for getting through my first residency interview day. Overall I decide I like
the program but I’m not committed yet. The residents seem happy and there is a
lot of things to do outside the hospital.
…
Before submitting applications we all meet with an adviser to discuss which programs to apply to as well as interview techniques and what to expect. Before then, when on an ICU rotation an attending told me that the most important thing to look for when interviewing was if the residents were happy. (Most appeared to be quite happy at Utah). My advisor at UW suggested several academic programs across the entire US. When I told him about considering Utah as well as Spokane, he suggested not applying to these because of poor academic reputation and that he wasn’t particularly fond of the programs, although he did suggest applying to Pittsburgh, which turned out to be a fantastic program. He also suggested several other programs such as Tulane, which would later be caught up in a racism and sexism scandal, as well as several residents coming forward anonymously to warn about malignant conditions in the residency. I’m certainly happy I did not apply to that program. Overall the advisor meetings were a waste of time, and if anything were distracting. It was suggested to me to not talk about wanting to go into nephrology and to take that part out of my personal statement. I was told that programs wanted to produce Cardiology and Gastroenterology fellows and would be less interested in someone looking to go into nephrology. I kept it and would continue to bring it up in interviews. After these meetings I couldn’t help but think back on my inpatient rotations at the Seattle hospitals. The residents seemed miserable. Not only that, but when I was on a pulmonology rotation a resident told me about a plan for residents to walk out for an hour in demand for fairer wages and humane hours and safe transport to and from the hospital (especially after a 24+ hour call shift). This was worrisome, I certainly considered not applying for UW at all after learning these things and after my poor experience with the OBGYN rotation and frustration with administration regarding it, and the overall poor advising sessions. Especially after having done a sub-internship at Spokane, where everyone seemed much happier than at UW.
…
I’ll
briefly go through many of the other interview experiences. There will be trips
and programs that I don’t touch on. I interviewed at Spokane which felt almost
like a return to home. It was a wonderful experience and I got to see many of
the attending doctors I had worked with previously. I already knew much about
the program and how I felt. I wanted to go into some sort of academic program,
and so Spokane would be my top community-program choice.
I interviewed
at Emory in Atlanta. My main interest in this program was infectious disease
(given its proximity to the CDC) as well as the County hospital, Grady Memorial
Hospital. I wanted to work with underserved communities as much as possible and
this seemed like a great opportunity. The residents were mostly happy, but did
admit concerns of being overworked and the area being too expensive. I had two
good interviews there, one with a nephrologist. I really liked the area and was
strongly considering it, but was certainly worried about having a life outside
of the hospital between work hours and lack of outdoor activities.
One of the best parts of interview
season was meeting new people who were all considering their past and future
and what it meant to live a good life. One person I met while at Emory, we’ll
call her L. After the interview day we agreed to explore a bit of Atlanta
together. We went to the park and ended up at a little bar and began discussing
what we thought was important in a residency and future goals and even to what
it meant to live a good life. She was worried about getting caught in a cycle
where one just keeps working hard and long hours—torturing themselves—for some
sort of future grace or happiness or freedom. Like, was missing out on all of
that life beforehand worth that future glory or goal? We discussed Camus’ myth
of Sisyphus briefly, which had become to me like a bible on leading a
meaningful life while reading it on the plane. We talked about attendings and
where they had ended up and if they were happy. Many attendings were caught up
in research and still worked tens and tens of hours every week—the easier
schedule did not necessarily seem to be ahead. The conversation went a long way
in convincing me that valuing the present time and time in residency would be
more important than merit or prestige. Just like the ICU attending had told me:
look for where residents are happy.
Next
was Pittsburgh. The residents here seemed very happy, a good sign, and one of
my interviewers was a nephrologist who also went to UW for medical schooland who talked about how much he loved being at UPMC.
There was a great food scene in the city and overall it felt like there was
more to do in the area than in Atlanta for me. The day went well and they moved
up my list quite a bit.
Next was Washington university in
Saint Louis. It was an impressive academic program and I really enjoyed talking
to the residents, who were all very nerdy about some topic outside of medicine,
which I appreciated. Unfortunately, they said there was not a lot to do around
the city, but some decent shows and music and bars. The interview day went
well. One nephrologist who interviewed me also invited me to join the community
orchestra given my violin experience. I really appreciated this and thought it
to be a good sign. Overall I was pleasantly surprised by the residents and
faculty at the program; it seemed more laid back and kinder than I expected for
such an academic program.
I happened to see L again there,
and we met up briefly after the interview. We had both thought at that point
that choosing a place to value the present and time during residency was likely
more important than merit. It was comforting knowing that someone came to the
same conclusion. She told me she interviewed at University of Washington
recently and that the residents brought up possibly striking due to low pay,
safety, and long hours. She also told me that faculty did not seem to be
receptive to this. I was unsurprised.
The last program I interviewed at
was Mount Sinai. I was excited because this program was in New York and right
next to Central Park. I had also heard that they offered housing for cheap that
was near the hospital as well. I flew in. The dinner was at a cocktail bar
somewhat nearby my Airbnb (hotel was too expensive). I talked to several
residents, most of whom told me they liked the program, but when I asked what
they liked to do in the city since they lived here, they told me they couldn’t
think of anything. This seemed like a bad thing. There was so much to do in New
York, so much that I wanted to do. It was surprising to hear residents say that
there was basically nothing to do. I wondered if they had any free time.
Another said about the housing that they called it the Mount Sinai Slums
because of the incredibly poor conditions of the apartments, including rats and
cockroaches and bad electrical wiring. While I was grateful for their honesty,
it made me worry and wonder about a possible New York future. Next day was
interview day, which was fairly standard. They showed us a morning report,
which was interesting. It was more about reading articles and presenting
objective data regarding the case, than refining diagnostic reasoning. While it
was impressive and certainly informative, I certainly appreciated the normal
morning report format. This program was certainly geared up to make fellows and
researchers. My interviews were both just OK. Many asked why I would want to
move out the East Coast when having lived my whole life on the west coast. They
were quite interrogative.
And so I completed residency
interviews (a few others not mentioned) and it was time to make my rank list.
Applicants would rank the programs, and programs the applicants, and then a
fancy algorithm would match everyone up (which is where the name “The Match” comes
from). I ended up ranking Denver first, then Pittsburgh, then Emory, and then
got delusional and put Mount Sinai next (turning my back on my decision to
value the residency time, but lulled in too much by New York City and the Prestige
of the program), then I ranked Utah, then Spokane, and then everything else
after.
When match day came around and I
learned that I had matched at Utah I was initially disappointed because I felt
like by not matching at a higher choice I was basically being told that I wasn’t
good enough. It turned out to be an absolute blessing. It was the perfect blend
of academics and Enjoying time during residency. Before match day I had gone to
salt lake again to ski and it turned into one of my favorite ski trips ever.
And with that I became excited to move to Salt Lake. It was a residency program
that cared about its residents no matter what and valued wellness greatly. This
would turn out to be incredibly fortuitous, and it made the transition into
residency easier and more relaxed than it could have been.
❤️
ReplyDelete